Support #746
openAdd 1 month policy to rating results when appropriate
Added by Greg Krabbenhoft 5 months ago. Updated about 1 month ago.
0%
Description
Currently, when a daily policy becomes more expensive than a 6 mo policy, daily isn't displayed and only 6 mo and annual are. There exists a 1 month policy option, and needs to be displayed when appropriate, IE when daily is more expensive than the 1 month option, as long as the dates are valid and do not exceed the 1 month time limit.
If you have questions, please ask me.
Files
clipboard-202412121449-mlaro.png (150 KB) clipboard-202412121449-mlaro.png | George Howington, 12/12/2024 09:49 PM | ||
clipboard-202502211555-d4ojk.png (480 KB) clipboard-202502211555-d4ojk.png | George Howington, 02/21/2025 10:55 PM |
Updated by Leo Esaki 5 months ago
- Status changed from New to QA
- Assignee changed from Leo Esaki to George Howington
Hello George.
I added a new logic to handle one month policy. Please take a look.
And here is new tokens.
QR_CC_BS_ONEMO_TAB_LABEL : ONE MONTH
QR_CC_BS_ONEMO_TERM_HEADER : (HEADER FOR QUOTE RESULTS)
If you have anything on this, please let me know.
Thanks, Leo.
Updated by George Howington 5 months ago
- File clipboard-202412121449-mlaro.png clipboard-202412121449-mlaro.png added
- Status changed from QA to In Progress
- Assignee changed from George Howington to Leo Esaki
Hi Leo,
I see the header change, but the calculations appear based on the requested policy period:
Thanks,
--George
Updated by George Howington 4 months ago
- Status changed from QA to In Progress
- Assignee changed from George Howington to Greg Krabbenhoft
Hi Greg,
We will need more direction for this ticket, as the results are unexpected.
Issues:
(1) The rate discount for each underwriter drastically varies between each underwriter. For example, GNP offers a discount starting 31 days. Meanwhile, the ABA products have a surcharge.
(2) Is this a blanket adjustment? Regarding the discount issue, some underwriters are cheaper using the selected data period, while the next underwriter favors the 31-day discount.
Please let me know if you have any questions and if necessary, a good time we canmeet.
Thanks,
--George
Updated by Greg Krabbenhoft 4 months ago
- Assignee changed from Greg Krabbenhoft to George Howington
Hi George. The 31 day timeframe won't matter for this change, as this is for 1 month or less. Denny has indicated some underwriters (GNP specifically, I believe) have a 1 month policy option, which may be cheaper than the daily rate as it nears that many days. For anything less than 1 month, a rate comparison should be run in the back end and return only the least expensive option, daily or 1 month.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Greg
Updated by George Howington 2 months ago
- File clipboard-202502211555-d4ojk.png clipboard-202502211555-d4ojk.png added
- Assignee changed from George Howington to Leo Esaki
Hi Leo,
As per instruction from Greg, the following issues have presented themselves in QA. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Please refer to the attached image. The right screen shows the live servers and the left shows the test server.
(1) During testing, the "30 day term" logo always appears, even after I dropped back to a shorter length policy. This needs to revert back to the selected days of coverage. For example, when choosing 22 days of coverage, it should show "22 days of coverage", as the 30 discount is not less expensive.
(2) Since GNP is the only underwriter with a 30 day discount, move the "30 day header" over the top of the GNP column. Revert to the selected term for the main header.
(3) When choosing a GNP policy to purchase when the discount is applied, I am thrown back to the 'quote request page' rather than continuing with the application.
(4) Once item 3 is corrected, please ensure the resulting policy reflects a 30 day period.
Thanks Leo!!
Updated by Leo Esaki about 1 month ago
- Status changed from In Progress to QA
- Assignee changed from Leo Esaki to George Howington
Hi George.
I fixed the existing issues. Please take a look and let me know if you find anything else.
https://gitlab.com/nfp-cross-border/polmaker-v3/-/merge_requests/371
Best,
Leo